For informational and research purposes only. Not medical advice. Content is aggregated from public sources. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider.
Performance & Growth Hormone · Comparison

Sermorelin vs Tesamorelin

A neutral, side-by-side comparison of two performance & growth hormone peptides — their mechanisms, dosing ranges, administration routes, side effects, and research evidence. For research and educational purposes only.

SermorelinTesamorelin
CategoryPerformance & Growth HormonePerformance & Growth Hormone
Also known asGHRH 1-29, GRF 1-29 NH2, GerefEgrifta, Egrifta SV, TH9507, GHRH analog
EvidenceFDA-approvedFDA-approved
Dosing range100mcg–500mcg mcg, once daily (before sleep)1.28mg–2mg mg, once daily (subcutaneous)
AdministrationSubcutaneous injectionSubcutaneous injection (abdomen, with site rotation)
Key side effectsInjection site redness, Headache, Flushing, DizzinessInjection site reactions (erythema, pruritus), Peripheral edema, Arthralgia (joint pain), Myalgia
Cited sources1 reference5 references

Key differences

  • Administration: Sermorelin — Subcutaneous injection; Tesamorelin — Subcutaneous injection (abdomen, with site rotation).
  • Dosing units differ: Sermorelin is dosed in mcg, Tesamorelin in mg — they operate at different scales.
  • Frequency: Sermorelin is typically once daily (before sleep); Tesamorelin is once daily (subcutaneous).
  • Research depth: this profile cites 1 source for Sermorelin vs 5 for Tesamorelin.

How each works

Sermorelin

Sermorelin works by binding pituitary GHRH receptors to stimulate GH secretion within the body's natural feedback loop. Unlike synthetic GH, it does not suppress endogenous production. Clinical studies show improved body composition, sleep quality, and IGF-1 levels in GH-deficient adults. Its short half-life (~10 min) means it requires daily dosing.

Tesamorelin

Tesamorelin stimulates pulsatile growth hormone (GH) release from the pituitary, raising serum IGF-1 and preferentially reducing visceral adipose tissue (VAT). FDA-registration trials (Falutz et al., NEJM 2007; JAIDS 2010) showed ~15% VAT reduction versus placebo over 26 weeks. Later randomized trials (Stanley et al., JAMA 2014; Lancet HIV 2019) extended the evidence to liver fat, showing meaningful reductions in hepatic fat fraction and attenuated fibrosis progression in HIV-associated NAFLD.

Read the full Sermorelin profileRead the full Tesamorelin profile

This comparison aggregates public research and structured profile data for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice and does not recommend either compound for human use. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before considering any peptide.