About Research Stack
Research Stack is an independent peptide research hub. We aggregate peer-reviewed literature, clinical trial data, and public community experience logs into structured, transparent profiles — so researchers can find consolidated information in one place.
Our mission
Peptide research is scattered across PubMed, clinical trial registries, biohacking forums, and private communities. Most people doing research have to cross-reference a dozen sources to get a complete picture of a compound.
Research Stack consolidates that — research summaries, dosing ranges, administration routes, reconstitution protocols, side effect reports, and community experience logs — into single, structured profiles with sources cited at every step.
We don't make medical claims. We don't sell peptides. We aggregate and organize public information so you can evaluate it yourself.
The Research Stack Editorial Team
Profiles are written and maintained by the Research Stack Editorial Team — a small group focused on translating primary scientific literature into structured, plain-language reference material. Our work is research aggregation and science communication, not clinical practice: we summarize and cite published evidence so readers can evaluate it themselves and discuss it with a qualified healthcare professional.
We are deliberately conservative. When the human evidence for a compound is thin or absent, the profile says so directly — we would rather under-claim than overstate. Every profile shows a visible “Last reviewed” date so you can see how current it is.
How we review profiles
Every peptide profile goes through the same four-step review process before publication, and is re-reviewed when new evidence appears.
1 · Source gathering
Each profile begins with a literature pull from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for the compound, prioritizing peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, and registered trials over secondary commentary.
2 · Verification
Every cited reference is checked against its primary source — title, authors, journal, year, and a working link. Claims that cannot be traced to a verifiable citation are removed, not published. Preclinical (animal/in-vitro) evidence is explicitly labeled and never presented as human-validated.
3 · Regulatory & safety framing
We state each compound's current FDA/regulatory status, flag investigational or unapproved substances, and note anti-doping (WADA) status where relevant. Where human trial data is absent, we say so plainly.
4 · Ongoing review
Profiles carry a machine-readable "last reviewed" date. An automated daily crawl of PubMed, Science Daily, and trial registries flags new evidence, which triggers re-review of the affected profile — important in a field where data changes quickly.
Editorial review verifies that claims are accurately sourced and clearly framed. It is not medical review and does not constitute medical advice, a clinical recommendation, or an endorsement of any compound for human use.
Editorial principles
Source transparency
Every research claim links to a specific PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov reference. Anecdotal data is always labeled as such and separated from peer-reviewed evidence.
No medical claims
Research Stack does not recommend, prescribe, or endorse any peptide for human use. All dosing ranges reflect aggregated research and community data — not clinical guidance.
Regulatory context
Each profile includes the compound's current FDA regulatory status. Where a compound is FDA-approved (e.g., Semaglutide, Tesamorelin), that context is stated clearly.
Community data attribution
Anecdotal experience logs are linked to their original public source (Reddit thread, forum post). We do not modify or summarize quotes — we link to them.
Content freshness
Profiles are updated when new clinical trials publish results or when regulatory status changes. The site's news feed refreshes every 3 hours via automated RSS aggregation.
No paid placement
Vendor listings are editorial, not paid. Affiliate links on the Supplies page are disclosed with FTC-compliant language. Research profiles never include vendor recommendations.
Primary sources
Research profiles draw from the following databases and communities.
What Research Stack is not
- A medical provider or telemedicine service
- A peptide vendor or affiliated with any vendor
- A source of medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations
- A replacement for consultation with a licensed healthcare professional
- An endorsement of any compound for human use outside of clinical trial contexts
Questions or corrections?
If you find an error in a profile or have a research citation to add, reach out.
hello@researchstack.co