For informational and research purposes only. Not medical advice. Content is aggregated from public sources. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider.
Healing & Recovery · Comparison

Larazotide vs LL-37

A neutral, side-by-side comparison of two healing & recovery peptides — their mechanisms, dosing ranges, administration routes, side effects, and research evidence. For research and educational purposes only.

LarazotideLL-37
CategoryHealing & RecoveryHealing & Recovery
Also known asLarazotide acetate, AT-1001, INN-202Cathelicidin LL-37, hCAP-18 C-terminal fragment, CRAMP (murine equivalent)
EvidenceFDA-approvedResearch-stage
Dosing range0.25mg–1mg mg, 3x daily (before meals)100mcg–500mcg mcg, Daily or 3–5x weekly
AdministrationOral (capsule), Subcutaneous injection (research use)Subcutaneous injection, Intranasal (for respiratory applications), Topical (wound care)
Key side effectsHeadache (most commonly reported adverse event in trials), Nausea (mild), Generally well-tolerated — adverse event rate similar to placebo in clinical trialsInjection site redness and irritation (common — pro-inflammatory at injection site), Transient flu-like symptoms (immune activation), Local induration, High doses may be cytotoxic — dose-response curve is non-linear
Cited sources3 references3 references

Key differences

  • Evidence level differs: Larazotide is fda-approved, while LL-37 is research-stage.
  • Administration: Larazotide — Oral (capsule), Subcutaneous injection (research use); LL-37 — Subcutaneous injection, Intranasal (for respiratory applications), Topical (wound care).
  • Dosing units differ: Larazotide is dosed in mg, LL-37 in mcg — they operate at different scales.
  • Frequency: Larazotide is typically 3x daily (before meals); LL-37 is Daily or 3–5x weekly.

How each works

Larazotide

Zonulin upregulation disrupts the tight junction proteins occludin and claudin, allowing paracellular passage of antigens, LPS, and inflammatory triggers into systemic circulation. Larazotide acts as a tight junction agonist by competitively displacing zonulin from its receptor and directly stabilizing tight junction complexes. The Phase 2b CeD trial (N=342) showed larazotide reduced the ratio of lactulose/mannitol (L/M ratio, standard intestinal permeability marker) and improved GI symptom scores versus placebo in actively-challenged celiac patients.

LL-37

LL-37 exerts antimicrobial activity by disrupting bacterial membranes via electrostatic interaction with negatively charged lipopolysaccharide — effective against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and enveloped viruses including SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Beyond direct antimicrobial action, LL-37 modulates innate immunity through TLR4 signaling, promotes wound healing via EGFR and FPRL1 receptor activation, and has demonstrated anti-biofilm activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Vitamin D is the primary driver of endogenous LL-37 production.

Read the full Larazotide profileRead the full LL-37 profile

This comparison aggregates public research and structured profile data for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice and does not recommend either compound for human use. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before considering any peptide.